these types of disagreements and debates within the community are good for the movement, they show that were not just a blind mass nodding our heads at whatever seems to work for us and that were actually pursuing the truth and evolving. this type of competition strengthens us.

if we all agreed and spent our time continually patting each other on the back without embracing opposing perspectives then this movement would be nothing more than intellectual masturbation. this shows that were are reasonable people who pursue the truth honestly.

Good point actually. I think it’s a waste of time to argue with the “antis” – even those who claim to be “pro-white”. They’re not. Since our enemies do not give an inch or actually care what our opinions or concerns are, it’s a waste of time to expend energy in argument. Our energies should be focused on making more of our kin aware of what’s really going on, not arguing with front men, brainwashed radical zionists, Israeli “internet teams” or Hillel House frat boys and JDL lap dogs who are putting in their mandatory internet troll time.

http://whiteamerica.us/index.php/blog/blog/kevin_macdonald_is_confused_about_ethnic_altruism/

I maintain that MacDonald is confused on the subject of ethnic altruism. Reciprocity and altruism are not mutually exclusive, so altruism can exist within reciprocal relationships. MacDonald’s theory of ethnicity attributes such altruism within reciprocity to relations among co-ethnics. More broadly speaking, MacDonald’s “An Integrative Evolutionary Perspective on Ethnicity,” the article referenced in this post, is incoherent. Although he denies that ethnic altruism exists in one section, other passages in the article rely on the assumption that ethnic altruism does exist.

“A small group in positions of leadership and responsibility has chosen to actively advocate for massive non-White immigration and state-sanctioned discrimination against Whites in employment, education, and business. They are in positions of power.”

I have two questions.

1) Are you talking about Great Britain or America? I read something recently about the Labour Party in England deliberately bringing in a bunch of non-whites to piss of the Conservative Party.

2) Do these people have names?

Suicide implies a deeply personal, consciously deliberated decision to self-destruct. What’s happening is not fairly described as suicide.

There are other explanations for inaction besides a desire to self-destruct. One is ignorance, reflected in the ubiquitous regurgitations of the regime’s propaganda that “all men are created equal” and “it doesn’t matter what color someone’s skin is”. Another is intimidation, reflected in the understandable desire of individuals to avoid the pain the regime inflicts on heretics. Most people don’t have knowledge or understanding of genetic differences. Those who do know also know they will be punished for acting on this knowledge. If anything this indicates an aversion to self-destruction.

A small group in positions of leadership and responsibility has chosen to actively advocate for massive non-White immigration and state-sanctioned discrimination against Whites in employment, education, and business. They are in positions of power. They know, or should know, that their choices are inflicting disastrous consequences on native Whites. They do so largely without our knowledge and without our consent. If this crime is to be reduced to a single word, then genocide is the word to use.