Kevin MacDonald: Well, that didn’t take long. Turkey’s involvement in the flotilla and its support for the Palestinians has now made it an enemy of the Israel Lobby, with all that that entails. All in all, it’s a good example of Jewish power and moral particularism. After long opposing any resolution on Turkey’s genocide of Armenians, Rep. Howard Berman, a major force for Israel in the US Congress, suddenly supports a Congressional resolution, stating, “nothing justifies Turkey’s turning a blind eye to the reality of the Armenian genocide.” He and “a host of other members of the House’s unofficial Jewish caucus have signed on as co-sponsors.”
Berman suddenly found his moral bearings, along with the organized Jewish community. The neocons are naturally leading the charge, summarized byJim Lobe who quotes from a report by the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs:
“If Turkey finds its best friends to be Iran, Hamas, Syria and Brazil (look for Venezuela in the future) the security of that information (and Western technology in weapons in Turkey’s arsenal) is suspect. The United States should seriously consider suspending military cooperation with Turkey as a prelude to removing it from [NATO],” suggested the group.
[JINSA's] board of advisers includes many prominent champions of the 2003 Iraq invasion, including former Defence Policy Board chairman Richard Perle, former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) director James Woolsey, and former U.N. Amb. John Bolton.
What’s interesting here is the proposal to eject Turkey from NATO. It wasn’t long ago that Turkey was being assured that it could become a member of the EU. Turkey’s exclusion from Europe is widely seen as a big factor in its change of foreign policy. Thomas Friedman: “After a decade of telling the Turks that if they wanted E.U. membership they had to reform their laws, economy, minority rights and civilian-military relations — which the Erdogan government systematically did — the E.U. leadership has now said to Turkey: ‘Oh, you mean nobody told you? We’re a Christian club. No Muslims allowed.’ The E.U.’s rejection of Turkey, a hugely bad move, has been a key factor prompting Turkey to move closer to Iran and the Arab world.”
And that’s the good news. The neocons and the organized Jewish community were big supporters of Turkey’s bid to join the EU–which would have meant that 71 million Turks would have the right to move anywhere in Europe. This would mean the end of Europe as having any defining culture or biological coherence — obviously not a concern to Jewish activists like Friedman.
It’s worth remembering that Jewish activist organizations regarded the admission of Turkey to the EU as a way of civilizing Europe and ensuring cultural, religious, and ethnic pluralism — precisely the policy proposals that the Jewish community has advanced in all Western societies, particularly since the end of World War II. In 2002, at the height of the push for Turkey’s admission to the EU, the Simon Wiesenthal Center (SWC) had this to say in response to former French president Valéry Giscard d’Estaing’s argument that Muslim Turkey has no place in the European Union:
Ironically, in the fifteenth century, when European monarchs expelled the Jews, it was Moslem Turkey that provided them a welcome…. During the Holocaust, when Europe was slaughtering its Jews, it was Turkish consuls who extended protection to fugitives from Vichy France and other Nazi allies…. Today’s European neo-Nazis and skinheads focus upon Turkish victims while, Mr. President [d'Estaing], you are reported to be considering the Pope’s plea that your Convention emphasize Europe’s Christian heritage. [The Center suggested that Giscard’s new Constitution] underline the pluralism of a multi-faith and multi-ethnic Europe, in which the participation of Moslem Turkey might bolster the continent’s Moslem communities—and, indeed, Turkey itself—against the menaces of extremism, hate and fundamentalism. A European Turkey can only be beneficial for stability in Europe and the Middle East. (See here; the statement has presumably been removed from the SWC website.)
Turkey in the EU was obviously a win-win situation for Jews: The end of Europe as a Christian civilization with an ethnic core combined with a moderating influence on the Muslims that would benefit Israel. I rather doubt that we’ll be seeing this sort of thing anymore. The chances of Turkey being admitted to the EU now are less than zero.
Valéry Giscard d’Estaing’s argument that Turkey has no place in Europe is just as valid against admitting any Muslims to Europe. Although the rejection of Turkey doesn’t change the present suicidal dynamic in Europe, it will certainly slow down the process compared to what would have happened had Turkey been admitted, perhaps allowing enough time for Europe to waken from its slumbers.
Tags: Kevin MacDonald
“So Whiteness in itself is worthless or actually evil as with the Afrikaners. It’s only value is as a precondition for being really Swedish.”
This is natural for Europeans. Whiteness is implicit in their nationality as i think it would be in America if slavery hadn’t happened.
WN in Europe wil be different than America because of it. If it grows big enough it will be an over-layer recognising mutual threats and enemies rather than some kind of pan-European thing.
Recent history has revealed and is revealing the limitations of implicit Whiteness.
Daybreaker
Whiteness in itself is not worthless. I think we European and Americans have a different concept of “whiteness”. To be Swedish is to be white, but it is even more, it is to be a part of the Nordic race, and the Nordic race is a subgroup, or a sub-race of the white race. Arabs and Iranians can also be considered whites, and are considered whites in America.
Here in Europe we do not see them as whites. Actually, here in Europe, “race” is not a topic because we assume that Europeans are white and Europeans are seen as something different from other “Whites” that are not Europeans, and then you have European nations, which people are divided once again into “subgroup/sub race” of the European race.
As Wandrin say, whiteness is in our nationality. Whiteness is a very complex thing in Europe; it is not as easy as in former colonies.
The American white nationalists say “All whites should unite” in some kind “pan-white alliance” – in Europe many nationalists say, keep borders, nation and people. These nationalists do not call themselves “white nationalists”, because it is not needed – because if you are a nationalist in Europe, you are implicit a “white nationalist”, but not in the sense of a “pan –white alliance”, rather you are Swede, Britt or Greek. The British National Party talk about those who are ethnically British – they do not talk about the “white race” in general. They talk about the “peoples” of Europe – and they happened to be white.
The concept of race is very different in Europe then in America. You have a simplified view on race. Whites are whites. The USA has since the beginning been a multicultural and multiethnic country.
Whites, when they came to USA came from different nationalities and “sub races/subgroups” but in context of multiethnicity, they had to define themselves as “whites”.
In Europe this has not been necessary, especially in Scandinavia – which has pretty much no colonial history at all and therefore very little “non-European” (or non-white, you like) immigration until the 1980s. When it comes to loyalty, our loyalty goes first to our nation, and then to our fellow nations, which in a European context, are always white, and often share the same religion.
But then again, I may be biased because I’m not a white nationalist, rather a Paleoconservative that want to halt immigration from the third world until we solve our growing problem with religious, cultural and ethnic unrest in our nations.
I was in New York a couple of years ago and then I travelled awhile around the states around the East Coast, it I not “white”, rather the opposite. Our European countries are about to be colonized. The massimmigration to Europe began 30-40 years ago. Some European countries like Finland and Iceland have less than three percent foreigners living in their land and Eastern Europe is still “white”.
We are getting swamped and it going fast, very fast now. USA on the other have, always been multicultural and multiracial, and your solution will be very differently from ours. We may deport our third world immigrants back home; you have to live your former black slaves and Native americans.
When it comes to Turkey – they will never become a member of the European Union. European Union is an exclusive club for Christian countries. The European Union is about to crack anyway. Greece, Italy and UK have deep economical troubles and the EURO (EU currency) is pretty much going straight to hell. European Union works hand in hand with the internationalist elite.
To defend Europe and it peoples, European Union has to go and then Spain, Greece, Malta and Italy can defend their borders by using force to hold MENA and black African immigrant out. European Union work pretty much as the US federal does when it comes to borders, keep the individual states from becoming independent and do something about the illegal immigration.
I think the flotilla incident has helped Turkey to become more popular among Europeans. Europeans (especially France and Scandinavian countries) dislike Israel. But, Muslims are not popular among the indigenous people of Europe. But then again, Albania and Bosnia is “partly” Muslim nations and they are “white” and European.
Both countries are disliked and there are growing numbers of voices that do not want to include Eastern Europe in the European Union, especially not former Yugoslavian countries. The paradox is that Eastern Europe; if they not enter European Union will be saved from western European multiculturalism, feminism and appeasement of Islam. Just look at Poland and Czech Republic, when they entered European Union, their culture has now begun to be eroded.
If USA keeps their hands out of Europe – I think we Europeans will solve our problems. But the history tells us, that American mentality of spreading liberal democracy and capitalism – will throw a spanner in the European works.
[...] Well, that didn’t take long. Turkey’s involvement in the flotilla and its support for the Palestinians has now made it an enemy of the Israel Lobby, with all that that entails. http://theoccidentalobserver.net/tooblog/?p=2289 [...]
Good. Turkey is better off not being in the EU. Also maybe they have learned their lesson about trusting the Jews. Time to rid the country of the JEWS, Take their property and send them over the border into ISRAHELL,
put a big fence up, and do not let them back in. I think the whole world is waking up to the evil Jews brining down the banking system, the education system, staring wars, the list goes on. TIME TO EXPOSE THE ZIONIST JEWS>…….murders since time can remember. They try to re-write history with lies……oh the poor jews etc…….time for people to see through their lies……
Hey all.
About whites; sheesh; whites. Hmm, Irish? Irish are descendants of the Kelts & the Iberians (Spaniards)…thus the mix of blond/blue & black/brown hair and eyes as well as fair/darker skinned; but they are all “white”.
Look at Italians. In the North they are just as the Germanics; but in the south they become darker; are they not all “whites”?
Then, you take an Italian from the south and compare him with an Indian from Gujarat or Punjab…& all of a sudden it becomes difficult to tell them apart…as long as we make them wear the same clothes, hair styles & don’t let them speak. Now are the Indians “white”?
Speaking of India, many of the North Indians are whiter than the Greeks and maybe even as “white” as the English Saxons….as said also the Arabs have their fair share of “white” peoples too.
I think, if we look at this from a proper perspective; it has little to do with “whiteness” but rather culture & beliefs (religious or no).
We (whites) are of the Arthurian culture…or at least the best of us are. Perhaps not under that name; but all tend to hold that moral, ethical viewpoint. We want and try to work toward equality, fairness, justice, industriousness/hard working, inventive, moral & ethical decency, high-minded spirituality, freedom, chivalry and such. This is WHY Christianity did so well amongst us. We had this in our culture and it took root easily there.
Sure we had times when we “went a Viking” or raided places as needed. We tried to expand our kingdoms in some cases (like the Romans or the Saxons); but we also tried to make the lives of our cohabitants on par with our own…the bastardized “Christianity” that we hear so much of however, was the making of some miserable control freaks who lived for profit & the banker’s favors (we know where they came from).
The “Jews” did not have this in their cultural soul. They were greedy, violent, backbiters, lazy (as far as labor goes), arrogant, liars and manipulators.
Even their own laws they manipulated to omit “non jews; aka Goyim” from any benefit therein (eg Jubilee, no usury, murder victims, rape victims). So the “Jew” can do whatsoever he wants to the non-jew “Goyim” because his Talmud makes us non-applicable to the laws of their god. Sounds like a bunch of crooked lawyers; and that is precisely what these “Rabbis” were/are.
Then what we must consider are those people who have like mindsets to our own.
First and foremost, we cannot permit Jews to rule our media, commerce, internet, education, legal & every other area of critical influence. This is what is turning us “white folk” into what is completely contrary to our history….a bunch of lazy, fat consumers without the moral compass to say no to our lusts…etc.
Then after we take back our “world” from the Jews, we must also ensure that no Muslims are permitted to hold their laws in our lands. If they want to live here; abide by OUR laws, or go home.
For instance; killing children for rebelliously wearing the wrong garment is not a proper punishment in our culture…these vile creatures (the ones who would do such a callous thing) need to be wiped out.
Likewise, we are not at all able to compare our culture with Africa or Jamaica etc. These people do not share enough of the same values with Europeans & North Americans etc.
We must learn to keep our borders tighter and be far more selective of who we let in. If their ethics, morality, culture etc; does not equate or surpass our own; we don’t need or want them.
Turkey, Islam aside; are generally white people. Israel, Jewishness aside, are generally white people. Both are diametrically opposed to each other (though technically they should be fairly close due to almost the same laws in their books) and to us.
Turkey has done no harm in this situation and Israel is completely guilty. But Israel can do no wrong in the eyes of the world (unless you are an Arab)…& that is another long and frightening discussion.
Like I said earlier; the first and best thing we can do for ourselves is to rid our lands of Jewish control. Ship them (and all their Zionist lapdogs) all off to Israel where they can live happily ever after.
Judaism is fundamentalism, and all of the psychological idiocy that accompanies such delusional ideologies.
To T.Nordman,
Out of curiosity, I read somewhere once that freemasonry in Sweden is a strictly Christian organization, and that the monarch is the hereditary Grand Master of Swedish Freemasonry. Does it play, or has it played any roll at all in Sweden’s immigration mess, or is it non-political?
T Norman:
Interesting, but honestly it is irrelevant blather. It almost seems you are trying to put us off the task by distinguishing the European aspect so. The white racial groups are under attack and in decline no matter where you are. Oh did I fail to mention Christianity? Do you not understand the meaning of this?
You speak from a perspective that Americans (when white meant American, and WASP meant definitely so) spoke from in the 50’s, 60’s and prior. The tidal wave has been crashing over Europe for 40 years, regardless of how confined and coherent you say your racial consciousness is. That nationalism is implicitly white obviously negates that a non-white could love the nation they are in. That may cause one to live with a lie. After all, it is not impossible for it not to be so.
You have an incorrect understanding of racial identity here. What the TV shows you is what the Jews (here and in Europe) want to program into the people to uproot and disempower them. So, a WASP does not equal [as in mean] an Italian American does not equal an Irish American does not equal a German American, although they can be, and are oft, true friends and brothers.
Jesus could be an American whereas, apparently, he could not be a Scandinavian.
Here, acknowledged, nationalism is spread among whites – and non-whites. That does not mean to say that identities do not remain, embedded in tradition, country, and family (it is a bigger country than yours). You are still allowed to love the national gestalt and land, although whites are the vast majority of these who actually do strongly, especially when the subject is ‘the land’ (taken as a cultural-historical construct and not only in admiration of its beauty; we usually do not like our government, and we especially do not like it now).
It may be said that identity is the heart of racial consciousness. Same with national consciousness. In back of both, to perhaps unascertainable extents, is security. So, along with the recognitions and allowances for American freedoms and liberty, we maintain (and value and want) the trunk of racial identity that manifests itself in the imperative for a “White” majority with the definite requirement it abide by bedrock American ideas and culture.
The old stock groups, particularly the WASPS and Germans, have been under incessant attack by the Jewish cabal controlling key institutions via their control of the press and money – a little easier to do if the cultural identity mandate does not revolve around strictly racial lines. America is not unique in regard to having Jews meddle in its situation, as you are well aware; however the American concepts of freedom and liberty bear with them a fairly vigilant commitment to fairness and justice, necessary corollaries. This commitment, along with the aforementioned generalized acceptance of white nationalism has left the old stock groups more vulnerable than the European nationalists to the same forces that we are both continually under attack by.
There is no evidence that European race/national-white identity has been any more successful than American white[race]/national identity in dealing with the same varieties of problems we both have nationally and internationally, particularly as regards the religion of Christ. We are both losing.
Perhaps everybody (save for one group) is really losing thereby.
“nothing justifies Turkey’s turning a blind eye to the reality of the Armenian genocide.”
Nothing justifies Israel’s turning a blind eye to the reality of the Palestinian genocide.
Mr. MacDonald is bang on correct.
Turkey doesn’t belong in Europe (not based on race but on religious & cultural reasoning)…but then again, neither do the Jews who are running Europe.
How do we stop them? Most Europeans & Americans get very tense at the least bit of criticism towards Jews or Israel…it is as though the Jews have a “spell” over the West.
But History progresses cyclically. I believe we will expel them…and hopefully VERY soon.
The Jews are like the Borg (Star Trek)…they are a collective and operate in strange & frightening ways. Though they are sometimes at odds with one another, they work towards survival for themselves & destruction (or at best; forms of slavery) for those who oppose (or don’t openly worship) them.
I am so glad to see that many have woken up. I pray more and more will…and soon!
Very glad to read Kevin MacDonald’s articles here. What an intelligent and keen observer of the human mind & sociol order.
Nordman: “The American white nationalists say “All whites should unite” in some kind “pan-white alliance” – in Europe many nationalists say, keep borders, nation and people. These nationalists do not call themselves “white nationalists”, because it is not needed”
We don’t call ourselves white nationalists because we are afraid to do so, but the Americans have no choice, since their ethnic roots aren’t in one single European country. It doesn’t mean that American “white nationalists” are more racially oriented than the nationalists in Europe.
When government and the media say that Blacks and Arabs who live in France are just as French as the French, we should be explicit that they are not, because their ancestors are not French. It makes no difference whether we say their ancestors are not White or not French: it is a racial argument.
I think the cultural differences between white nations are becoming less relevant today because we are no longer allowed to live in natural societies. The more alienated we are from government and the media, and the more non-whites there are around us, the more we see ourselves as white, and the less we care about our specific nationality. If a Russian, a Portuguese, or an American settle down in Paris, I think that ethnically French Parisians will see them as fellow white people. Today, people think like that: if you are around white people, you are safe. If not, you are unsafe.
As long as white people, or “Euros,” put their immediate economic gain above their long term “social capital” they are doomed. The Jews are merely exploiting, or quite literally “capitalizing,” on an already existing pathology of self-betrayal. And democracy is conducive, nay instrumental, to just such an ethnocultural sell-off. Today, we in the West must endure all the oppressiveness of statism without any of the privileges of a just, i.e., Christian, fascism. Which will expire first: democracy or the race?
“Nothing justifies Turkey’s turning a blind eye to the reality of the Armenian genocide.
“Nothing justifies Israel’s turning a blind eye to the reality of the Palestinian genocide” (Andrew)
Andrew, didn’t anyone ever tell you that the (crypto)Jews perpetrated the Armenian holocaust, and that’s why America and Israel officially deny it (although both go hysterical over anyone denying the Jewish holocaust in WWII) (Turkey’s military is said to be comprised of mostly crypto-Jews–hence their own denial)
The slogan “Never Again” rings hollow, because it has come really mean: “Never Again For Jews Only, Who Reserve The Right To Perpetrate Their Own Holocaust”
mystic says: “The slogan “Never Again” rings hollow, because it has come really mean: “Never Again For Jews Only, Who Reserve The Right To Perpetrate Their Own Holocaust””
It is “never again to the Jews” and it always was. I had this explained to me forcefully when I asked about a big, costly Holocaust educational project, and nobody was rattling a cup for or even saying a kind word about protesters who were trying to stop the current “Holocaust” in former Yugoslavia.
Should somebody have said something? No! It’s never again TO THE JEWS and only to appease the antisemites was the last part ever left out. That’s why antisemites, such as Poles, have no answer to “Never again!” Because it sounds like it protects them too. But what was happening in former Yugoslavia was not directed against the Jews, so it had nothing to do with “Never again!”
Hoo-kayyy…
Understand with all your clarity of mind and strength of will that “Never again!” means absolutely zero protection for Whites with Jews as a hostile elite.
I don’t like turning a blind eye to genocide, especially not the genocide of the Armenians.
But it seems to me that by pushing America’s government to make Turkey pay a painful price for anti-Israeli rhetoric, the Jewish lobby is playing a very nasty game of “let’s you and him fight” and it is deeply contrary to the American national interest to play that game.
The point is, the aggressive Jewish temperament will not allow Jews to leave well enough alone. Now that the Turks have stepped out of line, there will never be a right time for all Jews to say, “the price is too high, so stop.” Perpetual moral accusation and escalation is more likely. It’ll be on and off, but it’ll never really end.
The price of this perpetual escalation can be paid by Israel and Jews, or by American Whites, who still get the blame for everything America does, though they are not really in charge.
Of course it’s in the Jewish interest for the Turks to decide that America is their real persecutor and problem and that anti-American alliances are the best response, while Israel’s role is forgotten. And countries already running anti-American foreign policies are likely to make the case for this to Turkey.
I don’t think the Turks are going to buy it.
The Bible:
Relates that the Khazar (Ashkenaz) Jews were/are the sons of Japheth not Shem:
“Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood. The sons of Japheth;…the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz…”
(Genesis 10:1-3)
Therefore, the Bible proves that the Ashkenaz Jews [Khazars] are not the descendants of Shem and cannot be Semite.
New Grolier Encyclopedia:
Khazars {kah’z-ars} The Khazars, a Turkic people, created a commercial and political empire that dominated substantial parts of South Russia during much of the 7th through 10th centuries. During the 8th century the Khazar aristocracy and the kagan (king) were converted to Judaism. The Khazars established their capital at Itil (or Atil), in the Volga delta, and for four centuries thereafter this Jewish empire held the balance of power between the Christian Byzantine Empire and the Muslim Caliphate. The fortified Khazar city of Sarkil on the lower Don River was built with Byzantine help and served as a crossroads to central Asia. The Khazars controlled many of the trade routes to the Orient; some of the Radhanites (Jewish merchants from Gaul), for example, were accustomed to crossing the Khazar empire while traveling to and from China and India. During the late 10th and early 11th centuries an alliance of Byzantines and Russians broke the power of the Khazars in the Crimea. In 965, Svyatoslav I, duke of Kiev, decisively defeated the Khazar army. Further to the east new waves of Turkic invaders overran the remains of the Khazar state.
Collier’ s Encyclopedia, Volume 14, page 65 states:
“Khazars [kaza'rz], a semi-nomadic tribe of Turkish or Tatar origin who first appeared north of the Caucasus in the early part of the third century…in the Eighth Century Khaghan Bulan decided in favor of the Jews and accepted Judaism for himself and for his people..
The Cadillac Modern Encyclopedia, page 822, states:
“Khazars (khah’-zahrz), a S Russian people of Turkic origin, who at the height of their power (during the 8th-10th cent., A.D.) controlled an empire which included Crimea, and extended along the lower Volga, as far E as the Caspian Sea. The Khazar Royal Family and aristocracy converted to Judaism during the reign of King Bulan (768-809 A.D.) and Judaism was thereafter regarded as the State Religion..
The New Encyclopedia Britannica, Volume 6, page 836 relates:
“Khazar, member of a confederation of Turkic-speaking tribes that in the late 6th century A.D. established a major commercial empire covering the southeastern section of modern European Russia…but the most striking characteristic of the Khazars was the apparent adoption of Judaism by the Kagan and the greater part of the ruling class in about 740…The fact itself, however, is undisputed and unparalleled in the history of Central Eurasia. A few scholars have asserted that the Judaized Khazars were the remote ancestors of many of the Jews of Eastern Europe and Russia.
Books writen by jewish authors;
The Thirteenth Tribe by Arthur Koestler
The Jews of Khazaria by Kevin Alan Brook
The Kuzari and the Shaping of Jewish Identity, 1167–1900 by Adam Shear
Facts Are Facts, by Benjamin Freedman
The Invention of the Jewish People by Shlomo Sand
“It’s a Trick, We Always Use It.” (calling people ” Anti-Semitic);
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUGVPBO9_cA&feature=player_embedded
netwit: “The Jews are merely exploiting, or quite literally “capitalizing,” on an already existing pathology of self-betrayal.”
Everyman has both materialistic and spiritual instincts. In the past, our elites used to encourage our high-minded instincts. But the institutions have been hijacked. Young people’s idealist tendencies are being hijacked by the media who teach them that the moral thing is materialism and immigrationism, whereas caring for their own people is immoral. The problem comes from the top, not from our natural tendencies.
“democracy is conducive, nay instrumental, to just such an ethnocultural sell-off.”
In a democracy, the media wouldn’t be dominated by a hostile elite, and government wouldn’t impose mass immigration against the will of most people. There is no democracy today in the West.
The Jews have a motto: Make war by deception. This means, to put it bluntly, Jews are backstabbing, lying, thieving, do anything they want, treacherous, dogs. They have only “PRETEND” friends that they use. Not my type of people.
The Grassroots Europeans do NOT want Turkey. The ptb may, but that’s becauswe they have their limousines, and mansions and salaries apart from the European Grassroots.
It was only a wink in the eye of Time, a couple of centuries ago, when the Turks were all over Europe in a conquering state of mind. The horrors they committed them, to the natives, is beyond belief.
That’s the methods of islam.
And the Turks, haven’t changed, Nor the rest of their cohorts in that abominable religion.
In Germany alon, the majority of immogrants are Turkish, pushing their religious agenda ( which in one and the same, with the State- there’s no separation of religion and State- they practice Sharia law). These insidious Turks have built thie mosques all over, whre they have their “call to prayer”- 5x a day – including 12 A.M. and 4 A.M. – 7 days/wk.
These abominable Turks insist on the European laws bending their way to accomodate them. This includes making European woman 2nd class citizens- while men, will enjoy the fruits of all.
This goes on from Norway to Germany.
You, people, better wake up, and stop the nonsense of “Multi-culturism” foisted on us, by the Eur. elite.
Remember while the Elite will live in their mansions, and ALWAYS inermarry with the new conquerors, it is WE, the lower classes, that will bear the weight of the yoke!
I, for one, refuse to serve men tea, all the while standing behind his chair.
AHO!
A Maverick Amazon Gnostic
The territory of modern Turkey was (in New Testament time) occupied by Greek-Macedonian and other Aryan Adamic folks who migrated SW from the Aryan Adamic core area. Ayran Medes and Parthians, and similar folks of Elam, Persis, Bactria [=Afghanistan], filled what is now Iran thru to Kashmir. Then they migrated west to fill Europe.
[Some folks in the old homeland are truly “white” to this day; see youtube video “real Aryans”, but most are now mixed. And the Islamic anti-christ “religion” system for dominating us is the major mindset there now. Islam is toxic to a Christian society. They are incompatible! You can’t have 2 masters!! We’re NOt to bond with unbelief.
The “lost” Israelites were put among (Aryan) Medes says a quote preachers refuse to remember: 2 King 18:11-19:30. Almost all of all 12 tribes got put there in the 700s BC. These “lost” Israelite tribes merged with other tribes of the same basic (white) race.
They migrated west to fill Europe… becoming Christians! (Medes, Parthians, Elamites begin a list of Pentecost converts in Acts 2:7-9… another line preachrs forget.)
They had filled what is now “Turkey” and it became a major Christian region thanks to Paul and other disciples! But the abominable “Turk” invasion and rise of Islan wiped it out!
For data on the migration of white (not “Jew”) Israelites embedded with Aryan Adamites, see “Missing Links Discovered in Assyrian Tablets” by Raymond Capt, or “Your Inheritance” by Robert Balacius of “STM.”
So I’d like to see our (white Christian) people regain their land now called “Turkey.” That would solve a lot!!
Why not move Turks far northeast to their homeland, where they became a mixed group, similar to “Ashkenaz” Turk-mixed ones (including Mongols and Edomites) who later took the name “Jew” as in Kostler’s book ” Thirteenth Tribe.” this gang moved west and built an empire NE of Black Sea, called Khazaria (capital Atil/Itil, Sarkel another big city). They got crushed in 1065 by Syatoslav (a Kievan Rus) , so they dispersed as traders/lenders in Europe. I’d love to see these pretenders to the “Israel” name get booted far far out!
And don’t turn it over to Arabs (descendants of Ishmael who are mixed; note “arab” comes from a verb to mix and turn dark – it’s like the word for evening. Check Hebrew word!) Nor to Palestinians (reworked Philistines). Nor to Phoenicians; they are just a mixed Israel-Canaan group.
Note that Around 130 BC John Hyrcanus defeated the notoriously evil Esau clan (Idumeans) and forced them to become “Jews” as in many older encyclopedias. Jesus separated real Israelites (who accepted him and became Christians!) from false ones (remaining “Jews”). Jesus noted the division in John 10:22-30.
Interestingly the Edomites had mixed (Gen 36) with earlier cursed Canaanites. (Gen 9). Secular archeology discovered (60 years ago) that Canaanites were lead by offspring of Cain! See C.W. Ceram’s “Mystery of the Hittites” based on deciphering the Canaanite Hittie language, from artifacts in what is now “Turkey!” The lingusitic “mystery” was solved, and it shed surprising data on (Bible-cursed) lineages!
So…. the long and short of it is that from Turkey thru to modern “Israel” and Palestinians and Arabs, etc. that whole region is full of people actually listed as God’s enemies! Yes, look in a Psalm almost totally ignored. Ps 83. Read it!
So from a logical Christian viewpoint, it is important to cut out all these sorts in Europe… or you’ll have the invasion from North Africa (Moslems, Jews, etc.) all over again!
Charles Martel stopped the invasion centuries ago with a big army from the north. He swept down and killed aliens, until he got stopped. Then the pace was slower, but our folks kept at it until the last of them left Granada in 1492, except some “Jews” who nominally converted to Roman Christianity. They were left. You see how that turned out!
John Taurus says: “The Jews have a motto: Make war by deception.”
I never heard this motto, and I don’t believe it exists.
You may have misunderstood something you heard, but Israeli military thinking draws on normal Western sources.
mossad’s motto:
be-tachbūlōt ta`aseh lekhā milchāmāh
by way of deception you shall wage war.
Proverbs 24:6: “For by wise guidance you can wage your war, and in abundance of counselors there is victory” (NRSV). (In Hebrew, “tachbūlōt” – “wise guidance” in English – can also be translated as “cunning”, “trick”, or “deception”)
basically, bible (o/t) is a satanic document too and deception, thieving, treachery and cruelty are the building blocks of judaic dna.
lobro,
The Old Testament is the inspired word of God and is quoted extensively in the New Testament. The bible is opposite of satanic and condemns the Devil in numerous place.
Even if wars commanded by God in the OT seem to violate Just War principles, God has sovereign power over life and death so the laws made for men do not apply to Him. Having said that, all public revelation ended upon the death of the last Christian Apostle so there is no excuse today for anybody to transgress Just War.
well, edward, i am in no mood to argue about these definitions but i place the moral law above god.
there is no reason to excuse him from any of the constraints we place upon ourselves, therefore, either the bible has been transcribed badly or he is in the wrong or his nature is plural and contains the elements of the devil.
whatever.
i am like a cop who has no qualms in arresting a transgressing judge, and if i wasn’t, i wouldn’t be deserving respect.
pax
A parent may justly break the moral law to steal bread for his starving child. Finite man has no capacity to judge the purpose of the infinite God.
Have u seen the article of JAMES TRAUB, the Turkish Dilemma ?! Where he says: So yes, young people: Do learn Turkish !
The enemy
feels the right thing to do by instinct ! Teaching Turkish is against the Turkish State Doctrine !
Turks learn the languages of others but do not encourage others for learning Turkish. That is very Turkic actually. For example, during Genghis Khan times, learning the Mogul language was a crime punished by death.
Turks had always been minorities within their own empires ! Their managerial skills obviously came from some secret teachings. One such secret text is quite famous: the 7 th volume of Mesnevi (The Masnavi). It is believed that Turks also do have the missing parts of the Critias (dialogue).
There is a part of Istanbul called Karay Koy (Karakoy). It means the Karay Village. The name comes from the Crimean Karaites. No one can be as Jew as the Turk !
Listen to this:
From his own writings it is clear that his version of Freemasonry incorporated aspects of Islamic Sufi mysticism, alchemy, astrology and Rosicrucianism. In his autobiographical novel Der Talisman des Rosenkreuzers (The Rosicrucian Talisman), he made a clear distinction between Turkish Freemasonry and regular Freemasonry: It must be shown that Oriental Freemasonry still retains faithfully even today the ancient teachings of wisdom forgotten by modern Freemasonry, whose Constitution of 1717 was a departure from the true way.
hmm edward, the trouble with this sort of relativism is that any line in the sand drawn thereafter is quite arbitrary and the principle can be abused.
in fact, it is abused all the time.
jews, by virtue of (self declaration of) being a divinely chosen group, assume the same prerogative, namely, we have no right to judge them and their actions, since as children of god, or rather, by placing themselves on par or even above god, they can do as they please given that the range of their parameters greatly exceeds ours.
ziochristians pretty much use their happy ignorance as excuse for moral laxity, to them jews are a caste of confessors onto whom the z-x’s offload all decision making and responsibility.
yowsa.
lobro,
All ostensibly objective schools of morality require a subjective starting point. Talmudic self-worship is one such staring point. Historic Christianity is another. As for Christian Zionism, that is only the latest manifestation of that Judaizer Christian heresy condemned in the New Testament.
i think that this is a very fundamental issue under discussion.
assumption of subjectivity is linked to that of a vertical structure, whereby different laws apply to different hierarchical units, i.e., the privileged ones are allowed greater laxity.
without claiming any sort of new testament scholarship, it seems to me a core principle of the christ that equality of treatment should apply to all living (or is it sentient) beings.
this view is expressed emphatically throughout the n. t.
if i am wrong, then i labor under a grave misreading.
but if not, the starting point is quite an objective one, presenting symmetry from all viewpoints, i.e., no one is chosen a priori, pro- or de-motion is based on merit alone.
this is a new development that radically differentiates the two testaments to the point of complete alienation and the fact that a huge majority of self professed christians fail to see it would be funny if it wasn’t tragic.
in your example of a parent stealing in order to feed a hungry child, you seem to be referring to something else altogether, namely that none of us can presume to be the ultimate judge without knowing all the relevant facts – no disagreements there.
Each person with power of reason has the free will to establish his own subjective belief. The principle of equality before law is apparently part of that Natural Law written on every man’s heart. However, the subjective will of the Creator is, by definition, the permanent objective reality of the created. Therefore, the only binding law upon the Creator, who exists outside of time, is His literal inability to lie.
Man’s pride and fear of estrangement from his often faithless fellows has always impeded his willingness to submit before the seemingly distant and non-human Creator. That is why the work of the Old Testament was graciously completed in the New with the human enfleshment and sacrifice of God in the second person of the Trinity. Even though Moses made provisional rulings for particular instances, the universal principles incipient in Pre-Christian Judaism were confirmed and expounded upon in Christianity.
Post-Christian Judaism is condemned by the NT as the rejection of God and embrace of that powerful but non-creative nemesis whose very essence is the lie. Unaided reason is enough to confirm there can be only one true faith. There have been periods of widespread, diabolical confusion such as the present, but traditional Catholicism remains intact after 2000 years.
okee-dokee, my point is just that; the use or abuse of old testament to justify evil in various forms, lie, hate, intolerance, slavery, elitism, theft, callousness, to name just a few traits of the jewish cluster.
whether new testament can elegantly restore the old one to a morally even keel is another matter, of no great importance to me now.
the fact is that jews found the nastiness in o.t. insufficient for their requirements and thus developed talmud.
so, either way, old testament has been supplanted to radically diverging systems.
as for the traditional catholicism, i imagine that you refer to st. pius x society, since vatican’s eucharist is these days stamped with the kosher approval.
“The Jews have a motto: Make war by deception. This means, to put it bluntly, Jews are backstabbing, lying, thieving, do anything they want, treacherous, dogs. They have only “PRETEND” friends that they use. Not my type of people” (John Taurus)
Well said. That’s why I renounced my Judaism. I have been embezzled or scammed 6 six times in my life and ALL by Jews, one was a “friend”, the other a sister. You have to be crazy to entrust your money to a Jew, no matter much you “trust” him or her. In fact it’ the trust that allows them to embezzle.They only associate with people to get something out of them. Attributes like loyalty or true friendship are anathema. Shakespeare wrote profoundly about this attribute which has existed for thousands of years. They would extract their pound of flesh i.e. kill you, as easily as eating a pie. They sometimes change their Jewish sounding names or have rhinoplasties so that their Jewishness cannot be recognised only to embezzle or scam. Avoid them like the plague.
They are the ones who talk loudly in the theatre or sue anyone with impunity. They are unbearable and have always been troublemakers.
lobro says: mossad’s motto (etc.)
Fair enough. You have a quote that supports what you have said. I have not heard it as a motto in common use. Obviously it exists whether I have heard it or not.
no great matter.
my point is that if a god behaves like a jew, he is a jew, which fits the talmudist agenda to a “t” (children of god, now having supplanted him as top ranking beings).
an inveterate antisemite that i am (and i make no bones about it, in a traditionally accepted sense, i.e., i certainly got no fight with real semites, the philistines/palestinians but cannot abide by talmudists), i am in no mood to look the other way in order to placate some jewish-acting, conniving, deceit+lies marketing god.
my god is either an honorable, gentile-like god or none at all.
Daybreaker:
“By way of deception: The making and unmaking of a Mossad Officer” is a book written by Victor Ostrovsky and Claire Hoy about Ostrovsky’s alleged career as a katsa in the Israeli Mossad.
Throughout the book, Ostrovsky claims to reveal details of the internal workings of the Mossad itself. Ostrovsky claims that Mossad has access to Jewish helpers all around the world called sayanim (sg. sayan). Their services can supposedly be requested on short notice and no questions are asked. Because of this, Mossad only needs 30-40 active case officers at any given time. He also explains the different departments functions and how liaisons are conducted with foreign intelligence agencies. One topic in his book, By Way of Deception, that may alarm Americans, is the suicide bombing of the US Marine’s compound in Beirut Lebanon that killed several hundred US Marines: Ostrovsky maintains that the Mossad knew there was going to be an attack on the American’s peace mission in Beirut and intentionally withheld that information from the Americans.
BTW, looking forward to KMac’s review of
Op-Ed Contributor
The Triumphant Decline of the WASP By NOAH FELDMAN
Published: June 25, 2010
Why did the Protestant elite open its institutions to all comers? The answer can be traced in large part to the anti-aristocratic ideals of the Constitution, which banned titles of nobility and thus encouraged success based on merit.
Another key source was the ideal of fair play, imported from the ideology of the English public schools, but practiced far more widely in the United States than in the class-ridden mother country.
LOL!
It would seem many big-wigged blowhard jews are trying very hard to dominate the ‘Causes of the Fading WASP Elite’ debate lately…are they worried about something?
Thanks Prof KMac! Let’s keep the bastards on the run!