Alex Kurtagic: Despite Andrew Neathers’ admission in October to the existence of a secret criminal conspiracy at the core of war criminal Tony Blair’s corrupt Labour government, involving Jack Straw and Barbara Roche, which sought to make the country more multicultural (or, more honestly, multiracial) in order to demoralise the Right, we see today yet more spin on the issue of immigration. The BBC (which did not report on the conspiracy) now reports:
Number of foreigners in UK hits record 6.7minvolvement in the Far Left terroristic Anti-Nazi League] said the figures did not account for those immigrants who were returning home.
The number of people from overseas living in the UK reached a record high of 6.7 million last year, the Office for National Statistics has said.
In its annual overview of population figures, the ONS said 11% of people had been born abroad.
Nearly 25% of all births in England and Wales in 2008 were to foreign-born women – another record.
Immigration Minister Phil Woolas [who began his political career via his
Maybe. But what is the percentage returning home? And returning home for good, as opposed to temporarily?
The births to foreign-born women made up 170,834 out of the total of 708,711. Immigrants from Eastern Europe, for example, had 25,000 children.
The focus on Eastern Europeans, who can easily assimilate, is a transparent distraction; what really upsets people is the huge influx of non-European immigrants, who come from the poorest regions of the world, constitute a low-IQ population, have a higher-than-average propensity to commit violent crime, regard the country and Europe in general as an economic resource, and are, too often, religious zealots who despise Western European culture and actively seek to change it and the laws in their direction.
The statistics agency also projected that the UK’s population would increase by nearly 10 million in the next 25 years, a rate which is almost double that recorded in the last quarter of a century. The ONS estimated there would be 71.6 million people living here by 2033, up from 61.4 million now. Mr Woolas cautioned that previous attempts to estimate future populations had been wildly inaccurate.
“These population projections do not take into account the impact of future government policies or those Eastern Europeans who came here, contributed, and are now going home,” he said.
Again, maybe. But those future government policies may well also lead to increases in immigration. So far the rate of immigration has increased through successive Labour and Conservative governments. Woolas knows it is the high levels of non-European immigration that upsets people and is, therefore, in damage-control mode, misleading, obscuring, and distracting with rhetoric and spin.
“Projections are uncertain. For instance in the 1960s they said our population would reach 76 million by the year 2000. This was off target by 16 million.
“And let’s be clear, the category ‘foreign-born mothers’ includes British people born overseas, such as children whose parents are in the Armed Forces or those who come to Britain at a very early age.
And let’s be clear also, those Britons are probably a small percentage, unless the term “British” is used in a purely abstract, legalistic way.
“Overall, net-migration is falling, showing that migrants come to the UK for short periods of time, work, contribute to the economy and then return home.”
Oh, really? So how come the ONS is not projecting an overall decline in numbers?
Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Chris Huhne said: “It is difficult for anyone to accurately forecast the population now, let alone in 30 years, after Labour and the Tories abandoned exit checks.
“We cannot know how many people live here if we do not count people out as well as in. Some parts of the country, like Scotland, need and want more population
Even if this were so, I am sure people there would also need and want to continue to feel at home, in communities that they recognise as their own, and would rather not end up living in a crime-ridden, alienated, fractured, run-down, multiracial infernos, like London, Birmingham, Bradford, and other cities. 25 years is enough time to autochtonously replace an ageing population.
while others, like the South East, are at the limit of environmental sustainability.”
Finally some sense, although the problem is not merely environmental, but also social, cultural, and political.
How hollow does Tony Blair’s 1997 general election victory speech sound now.
What is especially depressing is the knowledge that the Conservatives will be no different. If and when David Cameron becomes Prime Minister, it will be business as usual: more immigration, more crime, more surveillance, more inflation, more propaganda, more McDonaldization, more ur, more political correctness, more laws, and more confiscatory taxation to pay for it all.
Tags: Alex Kurtagic
” involving Jack Straw and Barbara Roche, which sought to make the country more multicultural (or, more honestly, multiracial) in order to demoralise the Right, we see today yet more spin on the issue of immigration. The BBC (which did not report on the conspiracy) now reports:”
One has to look at 2009 Great Britain and ask themselves ‘Would the planned Germanisation program of the National Socialists have actually been better then the current Far Leftist Social Engineering occuring now for Albion?’
None of this chav stuff, no Amy Winehouse degeneracy, no rants about ‘being hideously White’, ones Race would continue to exist…
‘If the British soldiers in Normandy who went to the beaches in 1944 could see what happened today, they would not have gone 40 yards up the beach.’ — David Irving.
P.S. There is some hope in that British folks do have the option of voting for the BNP, wish there was some sort of similar option here in the States.
“P.S. There is some hope in that British folks do have the option of voting for the BNP, wish there was some sort of similar option here in the States.”
If you go to Facebook and check out pro and anti BNP membership you have all the info you need.
Pro-BNP groups add up to less than 15,000.
Anti-BNP membership is over 720,000.
Why, oh WHY, didn’t Mr. Griffin mention that?
It would have made it clear to the world what ruthless bullies they are.
Their paranoia would have been exposed and it would’ve undermined their self-congratulatory claims of “tolerance”.
It would also have exposed the depths of their duplicity and anti-White hatred.
But above all it would have exposed their obsession with conformity, and their habit of absolutizing. He could then state the obvious, ie; that such behavior is sick and the roots are psychological, not moral or intellectual. And far from being superior, such beliefs are delusional. They represent a disease and the BNP a humble step in the direction of a cure.
Oh well, maybe next time.
“One has to look at 2009 Great Britain and ask themselves ‘Would the planned Germanisation program of the National Socialists have actually been better then the current Far Leftist Social Engineering occuring now for Albion?”
Chuck, with all due respect, I see your point yet still must demur. Yes, fascism would be superior to the PC that is now destroying the West. But fascism is better than PC in the same way that losing one arm is better than losing both.
Actually both fascism and PC, as movements of the left, are bad for the same reason, and that is that both wantonly destroy our culture. And without a culture whites will perish as surely as they will under PC, albeit more slowly.
When Bolsheviks were criticized for their cruelty, they would mock and deride these concerns as “bourgeois morality”. Wanton killing and other atrocious behaviors are only wrong because our cultural values make them wrong. Do away with our culture and all is permitted to the ruling elites.
I think for many reasons that the only hope for whites and the West is to attempt to regain our culture. Fascism is the recognition by conservatives that our cultures are either too far gone, or plain not worth trying to save. I’m not ready to throw in the towel yet.
If change is not necessary, it is necessary not to change.